↓ Skip to main content

Australian Oryza: Utility and Conservation

Overview of attention for article published in Rice, December 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (59th percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
52 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
38 Mendeley
Title
Australian Oryza: Utility and Conservation
Published in
Rice, December 2009
DOI 10.1007/s12284-009-9034-y
Authors

Robert J. Henry, Nicole Rice, Daniel L. E. Waters, Shabana Kasem, Ryuji Ishikawa, Yin Hao, Sally Dillon, Darren Crayn, Rod Wing, Duncan Vaughan

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 38 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Philippines 1 3%
Benin 1 3%
Unknown 36 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 9 24%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 21%
Student > Master 3 8%
Other 2 5%
Lecturer 2 5%
Other 4 11%
Unknown 10 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 17 45%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 11%
Computer Science 2 5%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 3%
Unspecified 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 12 32%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 October 2018.
All research outputs
#4,599,140
of 14,854,534 outputs
Outputs from Rice
#55
of 268 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#100,854
of 258,459 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Rice
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,854,534 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 268 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 258,459 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them