↓ Skip to main content

Carnation Atoms? A History of Nuclear Energy in Portugal

Overview of attention for article published in Minerva A Review of Science, Learning and Policy , April 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
3 Mendeley
Title
Carnation Atoms? A History of Nuclear Energy in Portugal
Published in
Minerva A Review of Science, Learning and Policy , April 2018
DOI 10.1007/s11024-018-9354-4
Authors

Tiago Santos Pereira, Paulo F. C. Fonseca, António Carvalho

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 3 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 2 67%
Librarian 1 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 2 67%
Computer Science 1 33%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 July 2019.
All research outputs
#10,165,682
of 13,316,854 outputs
Outputs from Minerva A Review of Science, Learning and Policy
#234
of 263 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#131,851
of 199,207 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Minerva A Review of Science, Learning and Policy
#8
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,316,854 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 263 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.9. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 199,207 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.