↓ Skip to main content

Psychometric validation of the work productivity and activity impairment questionnaire in ulcerative colitis: results from a systematic literature review

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes, December 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
23 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
31 Mendeley
Title
Psychometric validation of the work productivity and activity impairment questionnaire in ulcerative colitis: results from a systematic literature review
Published in
Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes, December 2018
DOI 10.1186/s41687-018-0088-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Aaron Yarlas, Stephen M. Maher, Martha S. Bayliss, Andrew Lovley, Joseph C. Cappelleri, Marco D. DiBonaventura

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 31 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 8 26%
Student > Postgraduate 3 10%
Professor 2 6%
Student > Master 2 6%
Lecturer 1 3%
Other 4 13%
Unknown 11 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 11 35%
Psychology 3 10%
Engineering 2 6%
Computer Science 1 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 3%
Other 4 13%
Unknown 9 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 February 2024.
All research outputs
#6,989,215
of 22,914,829 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes
#137
of 497 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#143,786
of 435,239 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes
#6
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,914,829 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 497 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 435,239 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.