↓ Skip to main content

Consequences of a Functional Account of Information

Overview of attention for article published in Review of Philosophy and Psychology, July 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
7 Mendeley
Title
Consequences of a Functional Account of Information
Published in
Review of Philosophy and Psychology, July 2018
DOI 10.1007/s13164-018-0413-4
Authors

Stephen Francis Mann

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 7 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 7 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 2 29%
Student > Master 2 29%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 14%
Researcher 1 14%
Unspecified 1 14%
Other 0 0%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Linguistics 2 29%
Philosophy 1 14%
Unspecified 1 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 14%
Psychology 1 14%
Other 1 14%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 July 2019.
All research outputs
#10,160,439
of 13,309,886 outputs
Outputs from Review of Philosophy and Psychology
#175
of 231 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#130,963
of 197,835 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Review of Philosophy and Psychology
#8
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,309,886 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 231 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 197,835 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.