↓ Skip to main content

Bad moon rising? The influence of the lunar cycle on amphibian roadkills

Overview of attention for article published in European Journal of Wildlife Research, June 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (74th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
9 tweeters

Readers on

mendeley
3 Mendeley
Title
Bad moon rising? The influence of the lunar cycle on amphibian roadkills
Published in
European Journal of Wildlife Research, June 2019
DOI 10.1007/s10344-019-1285-3
Authors

F. Mestre, H. Lopes, T. Pinto, L. G. Sousa, A. Mira, S. M. Santos

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 3 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor 1 33%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 33%
Researcher 1 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 2 67%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 33%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 August 2019.
All research outputs
#2,919,877
of 13,415,438 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Wildlife Research
#117
of 543 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#63,246
of 234,018 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Wildlife Research
#8
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,415,438 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 78th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 543 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 234,018 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.