↓ Skip to main content

Do Self-Myofascial Release Devices Release Myofascia? Rolling Mechanisms: A Narrative Review

Overview of attention for article published in Sports Medicine, June 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (64th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
106 tweeters
facebook
6 Facebook pages
Title
Do Self-Myofascial Release Devices Release Myofascia? Rolling Mechanisms: A Narrative Review
Published in
Sports Medicine, June 2019
DOI 10.1007/s40279-019-01149-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

David G. Behm, Jan Wilke

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 106 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 66. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 August 2019.
All research outputs
#252,355
of 13,360,873 outputs
Outputs from Sports Medicine
#281
of 2,186 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,926
of 222,865 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Sports Medicine
#12
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,360,873 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,186 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 31.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 222,865 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.