| Title |
Effects of early and later life environmental enrichment and personality on attention bias in pigs (Sus scrofa domesticus)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Animal Cognition, June 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10071-019-01287-w |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Lu Luo, Inonge Reimert, Elske N. de Haas, Bas Kemp, J. Elizabeth Bolhuis |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 19 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 3 | 16% |
| Switzerland | 2 | 11% |
| Germany | 2 | 11% |
| Australia | 1 | 5% |
| Belgium | 1 | 5% |
| India | 1 | 5% |
| Brazil | 1 | 5% |
| United States | 1 | 5% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 5 | 26% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 10 | 53% |
| Scientists | 6 | 32% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 11% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 83 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 83 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 18 | 22% |
| Student > Master | 14 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 12% |
| Researcher | 8 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 4 | 5% |
| Unknown | 26 | 31% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 34 | 41% |
| Psychology | 5 | 6% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 4 | 5% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 2% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 4 | 5% |
| Unknown | 32 | 39% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 November 2019.
All research outputs
#3,402,499
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Animal Cognition
#613
of 1,587 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#67,578
of 368,069 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Animal Cognition
#19
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,587 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 368,069 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.