↓ Skip to main content

Do we need to differentiate “true” inflammatory pseudotumor from IgG4-related disease?

Overview of attention for article published in European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, June 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
2 Mendeley
Title
Do we need to differentiate “true” inflammatory pseudotumor from IgG4-related disease?
Published in
European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, June 2019
DOI 10.1007/s00405-019-05530-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mitsuhiro Akiyama

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 2 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 2 100%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 1 50%
Unknown 1 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 June 2019.
All research outputs
#18,684,896
of 23,151,189 outputs
Outputs from European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology
#1,682
of 3,136 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#261,309
of 351,000 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology
#29
of 53 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,151,189 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,136 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 351,000 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 53 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.