↓ Skip to main content

Correction to: Evaluation of optimum temperature for the early larval growth of Japanese eel in captivity

Overview of attention for article published in Fisheries Science, June 2019
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter
Title
Correction to: Evaluation of optimum temperature for the early larval growth of Japanese eel in captivity
Published in
Fisheries Science, June 2019
DOI 10.1007/s12562-019-01328-w
Authors

Mari Kuroki, Akihiro Okamura, Yoshiaki Yamada, Shunsuke Hayasaka, Katsumi Tsukamoto

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 June 2019.
All research outputs
#11,848,446
of 13,355,879 outputs
Outputs from Fisheries Science
#317
of 350 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#182,527
of 223,321 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Fisheries Science
#3
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,355,879 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 350 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 223,321 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.