↓ Skip to main content

Invalidating Caregiving Environments, Specific Emotion Regulation Deficits, and Non-suicidal Self-injury

Overview of attention for article published in Child Psychiatry & Human Development, June 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Readers on

mendeley
4 Mendeley
Title
Invalidating Caregiving Environments, Specific Emotion Regulation Deficits, and Non-suicidal Self-injury
Published in
Child Psychiatry & Human Development, June 2019
DOI 10.1007/s10578-019-00908-2
Authors

Camille Guérin-Marion, Jodi Martin, Marie-France Lafontaine, Jean-François Bureau

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 4 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 2 50%
Researcher 1 25%
Student > Master 1 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Arts and Humanities 1 25%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 25%
Psychology 1 25%
Social Sciences 1 25%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 June 2019.
All research outputs
#8,809,941
of 14,061,361 outputs
Outputs from Child Psychiatry & Human Development
#337
of 563 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#150,714
of 255,330 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Child Psychiatry & Human Development
#23
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,061,361 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 563 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 255,330 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.