↓ Skip to main content

S100A2 in cancerogenesis: a friend or a foe?

Overview of attention for article published in Amino Acids, June 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (60th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
34 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
21 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
S100A2 in cancerogenesis: a friend or a foe?
Published in
Amino Acids, June 2010
DOI 10.1007/s00726-010-0623-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Susann Wolf, Cathleen Haase-Kohn, Jens Pietzsch

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Denmark 1 5%
United States 1 5%
Unknown 19 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 43%
Researcher 6 29%
Student > Bachelor 3 14%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 10%
Student > Postgraduate 1 5%
Other 0 0%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 33%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 33%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 29%
Psychology 1 5%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 June 2019.
All research outputs
#4,052,873
of 13,549,568 outputs
Outputs from Amino Acids
#319
of 1,062 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#96,022
of 249,448 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Amino Acids
#2
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,549,568 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,062 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 249,448 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.