↓ Skip to main content

Acute effects of very low-volume high-intensity interval training on muscular fatigue and serum testosterone level vary according to age and training status

Overview of attention for article published in European Journal of Applied Physiology and Occupational Physiology, June 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (62nd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
7 tweeters
Title
Acute effects of very low-volume high-intensity interval training on muscular fatigue and serum testosterone level vary according to age and training status
Published in
European Journal of Applied Physiology and Occupational Physiology, June 2019
DOI 10.1007/s00421-019-04162-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

T. Venckunas, R. Krusnauskas, A. Snieckus, N. Eimantas, N. Baranauskiene, A. Skurvydas, M. Brazaitis, S. Kamandulis

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 June 2019.
All research outputs
#3,942,395
of 13,285,289 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Applied Physiology and Occupational Physiology
#1,245
of 2,943 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#72,372
of 194,185 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Applied Physiology and Occupational Physiology
#30
of 45 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,285,289 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,943 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.4. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 194,185 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 45 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.