↓ Skip to main content

Evaluation of aphrodisiac activity of ethanol extract of Ganoderma lucidum in male Wistar rats

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Phytoscience, October 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
1 X user
reddit
1 Redditor

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
17 Mendeley
Title
Evaluation of aphrodisiac activity of ethanol extract of Ganoderma lucidum in male Wistar rats
Published in
Clinical Phytoscience, October 2018
DOI 10.1186/s40816-018-0086-7
Authors

Hammad Ahmed, Muhammad Aslam

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 17 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 12%
Student > Postgraduate 2 12%
Lecturer 1 6%
Student > Master 1 6%
Student > Bachelor 1 6%
Other 2 12%
Unknown 8 47%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 29%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 6%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 6%
Engineering 1 6%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 8 47%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 January 2024.
All research outputs
#2,579,835
of 25,193,883 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Phytoscience
#7
of 70 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#52,563
of 357,611 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Phytoscience
#2
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,193,883 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 70 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 357,611 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.