↓ Skip to main content

Palaeomagnetism for chronologies of recent alpine lake sediments: successes and limits

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Paleolimnology, June 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Readers on

mendeley
3 Mendeley
Title
Palaeomagnetism for chronologies of recent alpine lake sediments: successes and limits
Published in
Journal of Paleolimnology, June 2019
DOI 10.1007/s10933-019-00087-z
Authors

C. Crouzet, B. Wilhelm, P. Sabatier, F. Demory, N. Thouveny, C. Pignol, J.-L. Reyss, O. Magand, A. Jeltsch-Thömmes, M. Bajard, L. Augustin, F. Arnaud

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 3 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 67%
Student > Bachelor 1 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 3 100%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 June 2019.
All research outputs
#8,497,142
of 13,538,736 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Paleolimnology
#168
of 242 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#146,373
of 249,130 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Paleolimnology
#8
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,538,736 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 242 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 249,130 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.