↓ Skip to main content

Effect of feed deprivation on compensatory growth in juvenile rock bream Oplegnathus fasciatus

Overview of attention for article published in Fisheries Science, June 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
Title
Effect of feed deprivation on compensatory growth in juvenile rock bream Oplegnathus fasciatus
Published in
Fisheries Science, June 2019
DOI 10.1007/s12562-019-01333-z
Authors

Sung-Young Oh, Jeonghwan Park

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1 Mendeley reader of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 1 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 100%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 1 100%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 June 2019.
All research outputs
#8,336,531
of 13,355,879 outputs
Outputs from Fisheries Science
#234
of 350 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#128,501
of 225,228 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Fisheries Science
#2
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,355,879 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 350 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 225,228 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.