| Title |
Effects of squat training with different depths on lower limb muscle volumes
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
European Journal of Applied Physiology, June 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00421-019-04181-y |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Keitaro Kubo, Toshihiro Ikebukuro, Hideaki Yata |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 659 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 134 | 20% |
| Japan | 48 | 7% |
| Spain | 30 | 5% |
| United Kingdom | 18 | 3% |
| Brazil | 11 | 2% |
| Canada | 10 | 2% |
| Sweden | 7 | 1% |
| Australia | 7 | 1% |
| Mexico | 7 | 1% |
| Other | 62 | 9% |
| Unknown | 325 | 49% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 545 | 83% |
| Scientists | 55 | 8% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 53 | 8% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 5 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 391 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 391 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 63 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 55 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 29 | 7% |
| Other | 15 | 4% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 15 | 4% |
| Other | 51 | 13% |
| Unknown | 163 | 42% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Sports and Recreations | 127 | 32% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 26 | 7% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 24 | 6% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 8 | 2% |
| Engineering | 4 | 1% |
| Other | 22 | 6% |
| Unknown | 180 | 46% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 569. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 April 2024.
All research outputs
#42,311
of 25,724,500 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Applied Physiology
#8
of 4,385 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#795
of 368,277 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Applied Physiology
#1
of 42 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,724,500 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,385 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 368,277 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 42 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.