↓ Skip to main content

Therapeutic penetrating keratoplasty for acanthamoeba keratitis: a review of cases, complications and predictive factors

Overview of attention for article published in International Ophthalmology, June 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (52nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
Title
Therapeutic penetrating keratoplasty for acanthamoeba keratitis: a review of cases, complications and predictive factors
Published in
International Ophthalmology, June 2019
DOI 10.1007/s10792-019-01137-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mehdi Roozbahani, Kristin M. Hammersmith, Christopher J. Rapuano, Parveen K. Nagra, Qiang Zhang

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1 Mendeley reader of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 1 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 1 100%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 1 100%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 June 2019.
All research outputs
#11,146,775
of 14,045,385 outputs
Outputs from International Ophthalmology
#270
of 591 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#184,782
of 255,008 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Ophthalmology
#8
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,045,385 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 591 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.7. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 255,008 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.