↓ Skip to main content

Toward narrowing the theory–practice gap: characterizing evidence from in-service biology teachers’ questions asked during an academic course

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of STEM Education, June 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
87 Mendeley
Title
Toward narrowing the theory–practice gap: characterizing evidence from in-service biology teachers’ questions asked during an academic course
Published in
International Journal of STEM Education, June 2019
DOI 10.1186/s40594-019-0174-3
Authors

Yael Furman Shaharabani, Anat Yarden

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 87 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 87 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 15%
Student > Master 7 8%
Lecturer 7 8%
Researcher 6 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 6%
Other 14 16%
Unknown 35 40%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 13 15%
Arts and Humanities 6 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 6%
Business, Management and Accounting 4 5%
Chemistry 3 3%
Other 13 15%
Unknown 43 49%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 December 2022.
All research outputs
#15,164,620
of 23,322,966 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of STEM Education
#278
of 367 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#205,793
of 352,668 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of STEM Education
#7
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,322,966 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 367 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.5. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 352,668 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.