↓ Skip to main content

Evaluating the treatment effectiveness and efficiency of Carriere Distalizer: a cephalometric and study model comparison of Class II appliances

Overview of attention for article published in Progress in Orthodontics, June 2019
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
23 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
103 Mendeley
Title
Evaluating the treatment effectiveness and efficiency of Carriere Distalizer: a cephalometric and study model comparison of Class II appliances
Published in
Progress in Orthodontics, June 2019
DOI 10.1186/s40510-019-0280-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kaifeng Yin, Eugene Han, Jing Guo, Toshihiko Yasumura, Dan Grauer, Glenn Sameshima

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 103 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 103 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 18 17%
Student > Postgraduate 10 10%
Student > Bachelor 7 7%
Researcher 7 7%
Other 5 5%
Other 11 11%
Unknown 45 44%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 52 50%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 2%
Unspecified 1 <1%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 <1%
Physics and Astronomy 1 <1%
Other 3 3%
Unknown 43 42%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 June 2019.
All research outputs
#22,767,715
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Progress in Orthodontics
#220
of 255 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#316,319
of 367,408 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Progress in Orthodontics
#5
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 255 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 367,408 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.