↓ Skip to main content

Acquisition and regeneration of Spinacia turkestanica Iljin and S. tetrandra Steven ex M. Bieb. to improve a spinach gene bank collection

Overview of attention for article published in Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution, June 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
11 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page
Title
Acquisition and regeneration of Spinacia turkestanica Iljin and S. tetrandra Steven ex M. Bieb. to improve a spinach gene bank collection
Published in
Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution, June 2019
DOI 10.1007/s10722-019-00792-8
Authors

Rob van Treuren, Liesbeth de Groot, Hikmat Hisoriev, Furkat Khassanov, Vahid Farzaliyev, Gayane Melyan, Ivan Gabrielyan, Loek van Soest, Corrie Tulmans, David Courand, Jan de Visser, Ryo Kimura, Jordi C. Boshoven, Takuya Kanda, Ruud Goossens, Manja Verhoef, Jan Dijkstra, Chris Kik

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 June 2019.
All research outputs
#2,017,161
of 13,157,317 outputs
Outputs from Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution
#72
of 389 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,764
of 141,335 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution
#2
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,157,317 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 389 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 141,335 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.