↓ Skip to main content

Training wheels needed: Lessons in professionalism from a liberal deferral policy

Overview of attention for article published in Perspectives on Medical Education, June 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (78th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (58th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
9 tweeters
Title
Training wheels needed: Lessons in professionalism from a liberal deferral policy
Published in
Perspectives on Medical Education, June 2019
DOI 10.1007/s40037-019-0520-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Michelle Daniel, Tamara Gay, Rajesh Mangrulkar, Paula Ross, Sara Weir, Emily Hogikyan, Owen Thompson, Sally Santen

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 June 2019.
All research outputs
#1,990,412
of 13,204,933 outputs
Outputs from Perspectives on Medical Education
#109
of 367 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,837
of 158,145 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Perspectives on Medical Education
#5
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,204,933 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 367 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 158,145 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.