↓ Skip to main content

Ambulatory and stationary healthcare use in survivors of ARDS during the first year after discharge from ICU: findings from the DACAPO cohort

Overview of attention for article published in Annals of Intensive Care, June 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#35 of 884)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
8 news outlets
twitter
14 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
34 Mendeley
Title
Ambulatory and stationary healthcare use in survivors of ARDS during the first year after discharge from ICU: findings from the DACAPO cohort
Published in
Annals of Intensive Care, June 2019
DOI 10.1186/s13613-019-0544-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Susanne Brandstetter, Frank Dodoo-Schittko, Magdalena Brandl, Sebastian Blecha, Thomas Bein, Christian Apfelbacher

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 34 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 7 21%
Student > Bachelor 5 15%
Other 5 15%
Student > Master 4 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 6%
Other 5 15%
Unknown 6 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 14 41%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 12%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 9%
Psychology 2 6%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 3%
Other 3 9%
Unknown 7 21%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 70. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 March 2020.
All research outputs
#409,999
of 19,141,916 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Intensive Care
#35
of 884 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,547
of 232,402 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Intensive Care
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 19,141,916 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 884 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 232,402 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them