↓ Skip to main content

Clinical Predictors of Rapid Gastric Emptying in Patients Presenting with Dyspeptic Symptoms

Overview of attention for article published in Digestive Diseases & Sciences, April 2019
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
3 Mendeley
Title
Clinical Predictors of Rapid Gastric Emptying in Patients Presenting with Dyspeptic Symptoms
Published in
Digestive Diseases & Sciences, April 2019
DOI 10.1007/s10620-019-05620-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Juan Gomez Cifuentes, Mark Radetic, Rocio Lopez, Scott Gabbard

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 3 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 2 67%
Other 1 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 2 67%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 33%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 June 2019.
All research outputs
#10,748,249
of 13,511,623 outputs
Outputs from Digestive Diseases & Sciences
#1,960
of 2,625 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#179,888
of 249,353 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Digestive Diseases & Sciences
#37
of 65 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,511,623 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,625 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 249,353 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 65 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.