↓ Skip to main content

The Peebles–Vilenkin quintessential inflation model revisited

Overview of attention for article published in European Physical Journal C -- Particles & Fields, June 2019
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions
Title
The Peebles–Vilenkin quintessential inflation model revisited
Published in
European Physical Journal C -- Particles & Fields, June 2019
DOI 10.1140/epjc/s10052-019-7012-0
Authors

Jaume Haro, Jaume Amorós, Supriya Pan

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 June 2019.
All research outputs
#11,741,225
of 13,226,239 outputs
Outputs from European Physical Journal C -- Particles & Fields
#2,967
of 3,979 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#174,126
of 211,186 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Physical Journal C -- Particles & Fields
#52
of 225 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,226,239 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,979 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.6. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 211,186 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 225 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.