| Title |
Thinking forward: promising but unproven ideas for future intensive care
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Critical Care, June 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13054-019-2462-1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
John J. Marini, Daniel DeBacker, Luciano Gattinoni, Can Ince, Ignacio Martin-Loeches, Pierre Singer, Mervyn Singer, Martin Westphal, Jean-Louis Vincent |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Mexico | 5 | 28% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 17% |
| United States | 2 | 11% |
| Uruguay | 1 | 6% |
| Sweden | 1 | 6% |
| Italy | 1 | 6% |
| Ecuador | 1 | 6% |
| France | 1 | 6% |
| Spain | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 2 | 11% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 14 | 78% |
| Scientists | 2 | 11% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 6% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 42 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 8 | 19% |
| Other | 6 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 14% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 4 | 10% |
| Professor | 4 | 10% |
| Other | 10 | 24% |
| Unknown | 4 | 10% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 17 | 40% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 10% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 7% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 2 | 5% |
| Psychology | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 5 | 12% |
| Unknown | 9 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 August 2019.
All research outputs
#1,946,087
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#1,742
of 6,555 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41,555
of 367,925 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#50
of 115 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,555 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 367,925 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 115 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.