↓ Skip to main content

Thinking forward: promising but unproven ideas for future intensive care

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Care, June 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (54th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
10 tweeters
Title
Thinking forward: promising but unproven ideas for future intensive care
Published in
Critical Care, June 2019
DOI 10.1186/s13054-019-2462-1
Authors

John J. Marini, Daniel DeBacker, Luciano Gattinoni, Can Ince, Ignacio Martin-Loeches, Pierre Singer, Mervyn Singer, Martin Westphal, Jean-Louis Vincent

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 June 2019.
All research outputs
#952,287
of 13,165,983 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#982
of 4,227 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,320
of 183,155 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#5
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,165,983 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,227 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 183,155 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.