↓ Skip to main content

Evolutionary perspectives on polygenic selection, missing heritability, and GWAS

Overview of attention for article published in Human Genetics, June 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
36 tweeters
Title
Evolutionary perspectives on polygenic selection, missing heritability, and GWAS
Published in
Human Genetics, June 2019
DOI 10.1007/s00439-019-02040-6
Authors

Lawrence H. Uricchio

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 36 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 22. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 June 2019.
All research outputs
#701,747
of 13,216,344 outputs
Outputs from Human Genetics
#64
of 2,540 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,850
of 209,427 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Human Genetics
#2
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,216,344 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,540 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 209,427 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.