| Title |
Protected area conflicts: a state-of-the-art review and a proposed integrated conceptual framework for reclaiming the role of geography
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Biodiversity and Conservation, June 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10531-019-01790-z |
| Authors |
Marcin Rechciński, Joanna Tusznio, Małgorzata Grodzińska-Jurczak |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Netherlands | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 33% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 33% |
| Scientists | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 120 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 120 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 19 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 18 | 15% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 11 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 8% |
| Researcher | 10 | 8% |
| Other | 11 | 9% |
| Unknown | 41 | 34% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 33 | 28% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 19 | 16% |
| Social Sciences | 8 | 7% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 7 | 6% |
| Psychology | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 9 | 8% |
| Unknown | 42 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 July 2019.
All research outputs
#15,643,456
of 24,780,938 outputs
Outputs from Biodiversity and Conservation
#1,848
of 2,382 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#200,712
of 359,174 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biodiversity and Conservation
#25
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,780,938 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,382 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.0. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 359,174 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.