↓ Skip to main content

Formal guidelines: management of acute respiratory distress syndrome

Overview of attention for article published in Annals of Intensive Care, June 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#10 of 884)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
321 tweeters
facebook
6 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
199 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
699 Mendeley
Title
Formal guidelines: management of acute respiratory distress syndrome
Published in
Annals of Intensive Care, June 2019
DOI 10.1186/s13613-019-0540-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Laurent Papazian, Cécile Aubron, Laurent Brochard, Jean-Daniel Chiche, Alain Combes, Didier Dreyfuss, Jean-Marie Forel, Claude Guérin, Samir Jaber, Armand Mekontso-Dessap, Alain Mercat, Jean-Christophe Richard, Damien Roux, Antoine Vieillard-Baron, Henri Faure

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 321 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 699 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 699 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 106 15%
Other 102 15%
Researcher 70 10%
Student > Bachelor 58 8%
Student > Master 58 8%
Other 166 24%
Unknown 139 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 391 56%
Nursing and Health Professions 51 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 29 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 11 2%
Engineering 11 2%
Other 53 8%
Unknown 153 22%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 211. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 September 2020.
All research outputs
#110,935
of 19,141,916 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Intensive Care
#10
of 884 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,588
of 281,327 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Intensive Care
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 19,141,916 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 884 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 281,327 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them