↓ Skip to main content

Effectiveness of animal conditioning interventions in reducing human–wildlife conflict: a systematic map protocol

Overview of attention for article published in Environmental Evidence, June 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
19 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
26 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
106 Mendeley
Title
Effectiveness of animal conditioning interventions in reducing human–wildlife conflict: a systematic map protocol
Published in
Environmental Evidence, June 2019
DOI 10.1186/s13750-019-0153-7
Authors

Lysanne Snijders, Alison L. Greggor, Femke Hilderink, Carolina Doran

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 19 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 106 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 106 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 21 20%
Student > Master 17 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 12%
Student > Bachelor 12 11%
Other 4 4%
Other 12 11%
Unknown 27 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 36 34%
Environmental Science 16 15%
Psychology 6 6%
Computer Science 3 3%
Social Sciences 3 3%
Other 11 10%
Unknown 31 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 March 2021.
All research outputs
#2,903,809
of 24,837,702 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Evidence
#115
of 321 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#58,736
of 359,384 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Evidence
#7
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,837,702 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 321 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 359,384 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.