↓ Skip to main content

Managing Algorithmic Accountability: Balancing Reputational Concerns, Engagement Strategies, and the Potential of Rational Discourse

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Business Ethics, June 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
13 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
87 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
125 Mendeley
Title
Managing Algorithmic Accountability: Balancing Reputational Concerns, Engagement Strategies, and the Potential of Rational Discourse
Published in
Journal of Business Ethics, June 2019
DOI 10.1007/s10551-019-04226-4
Authors

Alexander Buhmann, Johannes Paßmann, Christian Fieseler

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 125 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 125 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 18%
Student > Master 14 11%
Lecturer 7 6%
Student > Bachelor 7 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 5%
Other 24 19%
Unknown 44 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Business, Management and Accounting 40 32%
Social Sciences 14 11%
Arts and Humanities 4 3%
Engineering 4 3%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 3 2%
Other 12 10%
Unknown 48 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 November 2020.
All research outputs
#3,045,408
of 25,755,403 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Business Ethics
#535
of 3,268 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#61,064
of 369,548 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Business Ethics
#11
of 74 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,755,403 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,268 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 369,548 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 74 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.