↓ Skip to main content

Managing Algorithmic Accountability: Balancing Reputational Concerns, Engagement Strategies, and the Potential of Rational Discourse

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Business Ethics, June 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
14 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
15 Mendeley
Title
Managing Algorithmic Accountability: Balancing Reputational Concerns, Engagement Strategies, and the Potential of Rational Discourse
Published in
Journal of Business Ethics, June 2019
DOI 10.1007/s10551-019-04226-4
Authors

Alexander Buhmann, Johannes Paßmann, Christian Fieseler

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 15 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 15 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 40%
Researcher 3 20%
Professor 2 13%
Student > Bachelor 1 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 7%
Other 1 7%
Unknown 1 7%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 4 27%
Business, Management and Accounting 3 20%
Arts and Humanities 1 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 7%
Decision Sciences 1 7%
Other 2 13%
Unknown 3 20%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 August 2019.
All research outputs
#1,417,750
of 13,745,552 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Business Ethics
#213
of 2,040 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#42,434
of 253,801 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Business Ethics
#9
of 70 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,745,552 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,040 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 253,801 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 70 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.