↓ Skip to main content

Endoscopic approach for management of septal perforation

Overview of attention for article published in European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, June 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (62nd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (62nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 tweeters
Title
Endoscopic approach for management of septal perforation
Published in
European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, June 2019
DOI 10.1007/s00405-019-05490-w
Authors

Isam Alobid

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 June 2019.
All research outputs
#3,856,801
of 13,218,736 outputs
Outputs from European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology
#175
of 1,678 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#78,219
of 212,000 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology
#13
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,218,736 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,678 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 212,000 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.