↓ Skip to main content

Three Camellia sinensis glutathione S-transferases are involved in the storage of anthocyanins, flavonols, and proanthocyanidins

Overview of attention for article published in Planta, June 2019
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter
Title
Three Camellia sinensis glutathione S-transferases are involved in the storage of anthocyanins, flavonols, and proanthocyanidins
Published in
Planta, June 2019
DOI 10.1007/s00425-019-03206-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yajun Liu, Han Jiang, Yue Zhao, Xin Li, Xinlong Dai, Juhua Zhuang, Mengqing Zhu, Xiaolan Jiang, Peiqiang Wang, Liping Gao, Tao Xia

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 June 2019.
All research outputs
#11,723,224
of 13,205,324 outputs
Outputs from Planta
#1,654
of 1,908 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#169,858
of 206,141 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Planta
#32
of 44 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,205,324 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,908 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 206,141 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 44 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.