↓ Skip to main content

Diverse photoreceptors and light responses in plants

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Plant Research, February 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
22 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
65 Mendeley
Title
Diverse photoreceptors and light responses in plants
Published in
Journal of Plant Research, February 2016
DOI 10.1007/s10265-016-0792-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sam-Geun Kong, Koji Okajima

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 65 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 2%
New Zealand 1 2%
Unknown 63 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 17 26%
Student > Bachelor 9 14%
Student > Postgraduate 8 12%
Unspecified 7 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 11%
Other 16 25%
Unknown 1 2%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 36 55%
Unspecified 11 17%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 14%
Environmental Science 3 5%
Chemistry 2 3%
Other 3 5%
Unknown 1 2%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 March 2016.
All research outputs
#10,383,987
of 13,018,224 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Plant Research
#288
of 442 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#184,976
of 265,243 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Plant Research
#10
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,018,224 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 442 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.7. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 265,243 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.