↓ Skip to main content

Hypothalamic malformations in patients with X-linked deafness and incomplete partition type 3

Overview of attention for article published in Neuroradiology, June 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (68th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (73rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 tweeters
Title
Hypothalamic malformations in patients with X-linked deafness and incomplete partition type 3
Published in
Neuroradiology, June 2019
DOI 10.1007/s00234-019-02230-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ata Siddiqui, Alessandra D’Amico, Giovanna Stefania Colafati, Domenico Cicala, Giacomo Talenti, Kaukab Rajput, Lorenzo Pinelli, Felice D’Arco

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 June 2019.
All research outputs
#3,304,140
of 13,210,706 outputs
Outputs from Neuroradiology
#76
of 643 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#66,137
of 209,215 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Neuroradiology
#9
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,210,706 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 643 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 209,215 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.