↓ Skip to main content

Mistaking an Emerging Market for a Social Movement? A Comment on Arjaliès’ Social-Movement Perspective on Socially Responsible Investment in France

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Business Ethics, February 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (57th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (58th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
67 Mendeley
Title
Mistaking an Emerging Market for a Social Movement? A Comment on Arjaliès’ Social-Movement Perspective on Socially Responsible Investment in France
Published in
Journal of Business Ethics, February 2012
DOI 10.1007/s10551-012-1241-6
Authors

Frédérique Déjean, Stéphanie Giamporcaro, Jean-Pascal Gond, Bernard Leca, Elise Penalva-Icher

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 67 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 3%
South Africa 2 3%
Vietnam 1 1%
Italy 1 1%
Ireland 1 1%
Unknown 60 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 25%
Student > Master 14 21%
Researcher 6 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 5 7%
Other 17 25%
Unknown 2 3%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Business, Management and Accounting 45 67%
Social Sciences 7 10%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 6 9%
Psychology 2 3%
Computer Science 1 1%
Other 1 1%
Unknown 5 7%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 February 2015.
All research outputs
#6,255,003
of 12,282,534 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Business Ethics
#759
of 1,719 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#48,233
of 115,242 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Business Ethics
#13
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,282,534 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,719 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 115,242 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.