| Title |
Linking up pressure, chemical potential and thermal gradients
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
The European Physical Journal E, May 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1140/epje/i2019-11821-0 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
François Montel, Hai Hoang, Guillaume Galliero |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 10 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 10% |
| Lecturer | 1 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 1 | 10% |
| Other | 1 | 10% |
| Unknown | 4 | 40% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Energy | 2 | 20% |
| Engineering | 2 | 20% |
| Chemistry | 1 | 10% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 1 | 10% |
| Unknown | 4 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 22. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 June 2019.
All research outputs
#1,488,221
of 23,498,099 outputs
Outputs from The European Physical Journal E
#85
of 650 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,393
of 351,153 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The European Physical Journal E
#5
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,498,099 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 650 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 351,153 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.