↓ Skip to main content

Linking up pressure, chemical potential and thermal gradients

Overview of attention for article published in European Physical Journal E -- Soft Matter, May 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
Title
Linking up pressure, chemical potential and thermal gradients
Published in
European Physical Journal E -- Soft Matter, May 2019
DOI 10.1140/epje/i2019-11821-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

François Montel, Hai Hoang, Guillaume Galliero

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 24. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 June 2019.
All research outputs
#636,173
of 13,184,217 outputs
Outputs from European Physical Journal E -- Soft Matter
#59
of 452 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,816
of 204,093 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Physical Journal E -- Soft Matter
#2
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,184,217 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 452 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 204,093 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.