| Title |
Evidence of clinical efficacy of homeopathy
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, April 2000
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s002280050716 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
M. Cucherat, M. C. Haugh, M. Gooch, J. -P. Boissel, for the HMRAG group |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 96 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 16 | 17% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | 4% |
| United States | 3 | 3% |
| Germany | 3 | 3% |
| Argentina | 2 | 2% |
| Brazil | 2 | 2% |
| Chile | 2 | 2% |
| India | 1 | 1% |
| Hungary | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 9 | 9% |
| Unknown | 53 | 55% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 86 | 90% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 5% |
| Scientists | 4 | 4% |
| Unknown | 1 | 1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 89 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 3% |
| Hungary | 1 | 1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 84 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 20 | 22% |
| Student > Master | 11 | 12% |
| Researcher | 9 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 9 | 10% |
| Other | 18 | 20% |
| Unknown | 13 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 33 | 37% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 9 | 10% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 7% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 5 | 6% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 17 | 19% |
| Unknown | 15 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 139. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 April 2024.
All research outputs
#302,771
of 25,753,031 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
#10
of 2,776 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#126
of 41,193 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
#1
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,753,031 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,776 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 41,193 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.