↓ Skip to main content

The Impact of Breast Density Notification Laws on Supplemental Breast Imaging and Breast Biopsy

Overview of attention for article published in JGIM: Journal of General Internal Medicine, May 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (60th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
6 tweeters

Readers on

mendeley
2 Mendeley
Title
The Impact of Breast Density Notification Laws on Supplemental Breast Imaging and Breast Biopsy
Published in
JGIM: Journal of General Internal Medicine, May 2019
DOI 10.1007/s11606-019-05026-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Loren Saulsberry, Lydia E. Pace, Nancy L. Keating

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 2 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 1 50%
Unspecified 1 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 1 50%
Social Sciences 1 50%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 June 2019.
All research outputs
#6,659,306
of 13,189,185 outputs
Outputs from JGIM: Journal of General Internal Medicine
#2,763
of 4,683 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#79,819
of 206,446 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JGIM: Journal of General Internal Medicine
#64
of 122 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,189,185 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,683 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.9. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 206,446 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 122 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.