| Title |
The content validity of the ANMS GCSI-DD in patients with idiopathic or diabetic gastroparesis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes, December 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s41687-018-0081-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Dennis A. Revicki, Sara Lavoie, Rebecca M. Speck, Jorge Puelles, Braden Kuo, Michael Camilleri, Cristina Almansa, Henry P. Parkman |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 40% |
| Unknown | 3 | 60% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 80% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 23 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 3 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 13% |
| Researcher | 2 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 4% |
| Student > Master | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 12 | 52% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 3 | 13% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 13% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 13% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 4% |
| Engineering | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 12 | 52% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 July 2019.
All research outputs
#7,057,226
of 23,149,216 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes
#146
of 511 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#143,883
of 436,856 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes
#6
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,149,216 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 511 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 436,856 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.