RT @SpringerCrim: 'Framing innocence: an experimental test of the effects of wrongful convictions on public opinion' in Journal of Experime…
RT @SpringerCrim: 'Framing innocence: an experimental test of the effects of wrongful convictions on public opinion' in Journal of Experime…
'Framing innocence: an experimental test of the effects of wrongful convictions on public opinion' in Journal of Experimental Criminology sheds light on how much of an impact the concept of 'innocence' can have on public opinion. Read here: https://t.co/C
Study finds that people presented with one case of wrongful conviction may be more likely to support criminal justice reform than those given credible estimates of the overall number of wrongful convicted people. https://t.co/a975cbtofN
RT @BrendanNyhan: A compelling narrative about a single wrongly convicted individual is generally more effective at changing attitudes abou…
RT @BrendanNyhan: A compelling narrative about a single wrongly convicted individual is generally more effective at changing attitudes abou…
RT @BrendanNyhan: A compelling narrative about a single wrongly convicted individual is generally more effective at changing attitudes abou…
RT @BrendanNyhan: A compelling narrative about a single wrongly convicted individual is generally more effective at changing attitudes abou…
RT @BrendanNyhan: A compelling narrative about a single wrongly convicted individual is generally more effective at changing attitudes abou…
RT @BrendanNyhan: A compelling narrative about a single wrongly convicted individual is generally more effective at changing attitudes abou…
RT @BrendanNyhan: A compelling narrative about a single wrongly convicted individual is generally more effective at changing attitudes abou…
RT @BrendanNyhan: A compelling narrative about a single wrongly convicted individual is generally more effective at changing attitudes abou…
RT @daviddesteno: A new twist in the identifiable victim effect. https://t.co/kvg4sEuA5D
RT @BrendanNyhan: A compelling narrative about a single wrongly convicted individual is generally more effective at changing attitudes abou…
This is also why, in the aid sector, NGOs fundraise off compelling individual stories rather than rigorous impact evaluations.
RT @BrendanNyhan: A compelling narrative about a single wrongly convicted individual is generally more effective at changing attitudes abou…
RT @BrendanNyhan: A compelling narrative about a single wrongly convicted individual is generally more effective at changing attitudes abou…
A new twist in the identifiable victim effect.
RT @BrendanNyhan: A compelling narrative about a single wrongly convicted individual is generally more effective at changing attitudes abou…
RT @BrendanNyhan: A compelling narrative about a single wrongly convicted individual is generally more effective at changing attitudes abou…
RT @BrendanNyhan: A compelling narrative about a single wrongly convicted individual is generally more effective at changing attitudes abou…
RT @BrendanNyhan: A compelling narrative about a single wrongly convicted individual is generally more effective at changing attitudes abou…
A compelling narrative about a single wrongly convicted individual is generally more effective at changing attitudes about the death penalty and police reform than statistics about the number of wrongful convictions https://t.co/WZSyzwrKw1 https://t.co/TMO
Interesting stuff: Does reading exoneration statistics and/or narratives affect support for the death penalty and police reform?
RT @CrimPapers: “Framing Innocence: An Experimental Test of the Effects of Wrongful Convictions on Public Opinion” in J Exp Criminol https:…
RT @CrimPapers: “Framing Innocence: An Experimental Test of the Effects of Wrongful Convictions on Public Opinion” in J Exp Criminol https:…