↓ Skip to main content

Using the zygomatic arch as a reference line for clinical applications and anthropological studies

Overview of attention for article published in Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy, December 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
8 Mendeley
Title
Using the zygomatic arch as a reference line for clinical applications and anthropological studies
Published in
Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy, December 2018
DOI 10.1007/s00276-018-2162-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jung Ah Park, Je-Sung Lee, Ki-Seok Koh, Wu-Chul Song

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 8 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 2 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 13%
Student > Master 1 13%
Unknown 4 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 3 38%
Unknown 5 63%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 June 2019.
All research outputs
#19,221,261
of 23,815,455 outputs
Outputs from Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy
#514
of 705 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#329,111
of 440,626 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy
#5
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,815,455 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 705 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.8. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 440,626 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.