| Title |
Can pictorial warning labels on cigarette packages address smoking-related health disparities? Field experiments in Mexico to assess pictorial warning label content
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cancer Causes & Control, February 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10552-012-9899-8 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
James F. Thrasher, Edna Arillo-Santillán, Victor Villalobos, Rosaura Pérez-Hernández, David Hammond, Jarvis Carter, Ernesto Sebrié, Raul Sansores, Justino Regalado-Piñeda |
| Abstract |
The objective of this study was to determine the most effective content of pictorial health warning labels (HWLs) and whether educational attainment moderates these effects. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 33% |
| Canada | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 116 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Indonesia | 2 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 111 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 17 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 16 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 13 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 9 | 8% |
| Other | 23 | 20% |
| Unknown | 26 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 27 | 23% |
| Social Sciences | 19 | 16% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 13 | 11% |
| Psychology | 9 | 8% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 4 | 3% |
| Other | 11 | 9% |
| Unknown | 33 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 December 2022.
All research outputs
#4,145,457
of 23,854,458 outputs
Outputs from Cancer Causes & Control
#463
of 2,187 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,833
of 256,454 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cancer Causes & Control
#7
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,854,458 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,187 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 256,454 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.