↓ Skip to main content

Can pictorial warning labels on cigarette packages address smoking-related health disparities? Field experiments in Mexico to assess pictorial warning label content

Overview of attention for article published in Cancer Causes and Control, February 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (76th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (57th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
3 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
60 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
73 Mendeley
Title
Can pictorial warning labels on cigarette packages address smoking-related health disparities? Field experiments in Mexico to assess pictorial warning label content
Published in
Cancer Causes and Control, February 2012
DOI 10.1007/s10552-012-9899-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

James F. Thrasher, Edna Arillo-Santillán, Victor Villalobos, Rosaura Pérez-Hernández, David Hammond, Jarvis Carter, Ernesto Sebrié, Raul Sansores, Justino Regalado-Piñeda

Abstract

The objective of this study was to determine the most effective content of pictorial health warning labels (HWLs) and whether educational attainment moderates these effects.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 73 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Indonesia 2 3%
Mexico 1 1%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Brazil 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Unknown 67 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 14 19%
Student > Master 12 16%
Student > Bachelor 11 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 6 8%
Other 22 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 22 30%
Social Sciences 16 22%
Unspecified 8 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 11%
Psychology 6 8%
Other 13 18%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 August 2019.
All research outputs
#3,403,288
of 13,565,336 outputs
Outputs from Cancer Causes and Control
#521
of 1,615 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,387
of 119,993 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cancer Causes and Control
#11
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,565,336 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,615 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 119,993 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.