↓ Skip to main content

Shear-wave elastography: role in clinically significant prostate cancer with false-negative magnetic resonance imaging

Overview of attention for article published in European Radiology, May 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter
Title
Shear-wave elastography: role in clinically significant prostate cancer with false-negative magnetic resonance imaging
Published in
European Radiology, May 2019
DOI 10.1007/s00330-019-06274-w
Pubmed ID
Authors

Li-Hua Xiang, Yan Fang, Jing Wan, Guang Xu, Ming-Hua Yao, Shi-Si Ding, Hui Liu, Rong Wu

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 June 2019.
All research outputs
#11,064,644
of 13,941,062 outputs
Outputs from European Radiology
#1,348
of 1,971 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#186,866
of 257,139 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Radiology
#37
of 73 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,941,062 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,971 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 257,139 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 73 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.