↓ Skip to main content

Exploring the link between irregular migration and asylum: the case of Italy

Overview of attention for article published in Genus, May 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
policy
1 policy source

Readers on

mendeley
3 Mendeley
Title
Exploring the link between irregular migration and asylum: the case of Italy
Published in
Genus, May 2019
DOI 10.1186/s41118-019-0060-3
Authors

Daniela Ghio, Gian Carlo Blangiardo

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 3 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 2 67%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Arts and Humanities 1 33%
Social Sciences 1 33%
Unknown 1 33%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 November 2019.
All research outputs
#1,589,096
of 16,669,654 outputs
Outputs from Genus
#11
of 56 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#40,521
of 271,541 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genus
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,669,654 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 56 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 271,541 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them