| Title |
The Importance of Consistent Global Forest Aboveground Biomass Product Validation
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Surveys in Geophysics, May 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10712-019-09538-8 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
L. Duncanson, J. Armston, M. Disney, V. Avitabile, N. Barbier, K. Calders, S. Carter, J. Chave, M. Herold, T. W. Crowther, M. Falkowski, J. R. Kellner, N. Labrière, R. Lucas, N. MacBean, R. E. McRoberts, V. Meyer, E. Næsset, J. E. Nickeson, K. I. Paul, O. L. Phillips, M. Réjou-Méchain, M. Román, S. Roxburgh, S. Saatchi, D. Schepaschenko, K. Scipal, P. R. Siqueira, A. Whitehurst, M. Williams |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 40 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 14 | 35% |
| Canada | 3 | 8% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 5% |
| Belgium | 2 | 5% |
| Kenya | 1 | 3% |
| Belize | 1 | 3% |
| Australia | 1 | 3% |
| Germany | 1 | 3% |
| Norway | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 14 | 35% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 20 | 50% |
| Scientists | 20 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 233 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 233 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 40 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 32 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 31 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 17 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 12 | 5% |
| Other | 32 | 14% |
| Unknown | 69 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 65 | 28% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 26 | 11% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 22 | 9% |
| Engineering | 12 | 5% |
| Computer Science | 3 | 1% |
| Other | 11 | 5% |
| Unknown | 94 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 32. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 May 2021.
All research outputs
#1,276,664
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Surveys in Geophysics
#14
of 325 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,722
of 367,086 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Surveys in Geophysics
#2
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 325 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 367,086 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.