↓ Skip to main content

Solid form changes during drug development: good, bad, and ugly case studies

Overview of attention for article published in AAPS Open, February 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
2 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
26 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
68 Mendeley
Title
Solid form changes during drug development: good, bad, and ugly case studies
Published in
AAPS Open, February 2016
DOI 10.1186/s41120-016-0003-4
Authors

Ann Newman, Robert Wenslow

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 68 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
China 1 1%
Unknown 67 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 26%
Other 11 16%
Student > Master 11 16%
Researcher 9 13%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 6%
Other 9 13%
Unknown 6 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 23 34%
Chemistry 14 21%
Chemical Engineering 4 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 6%
Engineering 3 4%
Other 9 13%
Unknown 11 16%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 July 2017.
All research outputs
#1,310,152
of 13,254,580 outputs
Outputs from AAPS Open
#1
of 17 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,069
of 268,088 outputs
Outputs of similar age from AAPS Open
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,254,580 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 17 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one scored the same or higher as 16 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 268,088 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them