| Title |
Solid form changes during drug development: good, bad, and ugly case studies
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
AAPS Open, February 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s41120-016-0003-4 |
| Authors |
Ann Newman, Robert Wenslow |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| India | 1 | 50% |
| United States | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 102 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| China | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 101 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 22 | 22% |
| Student > Master | 14 | 14% |
| Other | 11 | 11% |
| Researcher | 10 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 16 | 16% |
| Unknown | 24 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 27 | 26% |
| Chemistry | 16 | 16% |
| Unspecified | 5 | 5% |
| Chemical Engineering | 5 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 15 | 15% |
| Unknown | 30 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 July 2017.
All research outputs
#3,094,110
of 25,517,918 outputs
Outputs from AAPS Open
#4
of 39 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#46,436
of 313,190 outputs
Outputs of similar age from AAPS Open
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,517,918 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 39 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one scored the same or higher as 35 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 313,190 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them