4,039 followers
RT @FireTechnology: Engineering Variables to Replace the Concept of ‘Noncombustibility’ | SpringerLink https://t.co/vAs7uwOqKy
400 followers
RT @FireTechnology: Engineering Variables to Replace the Concept of ‘Noncombustibility’ | SpringerLink https://t.co/vAs7uwOqKy
6,195 followers
RT @FireTechnology: Engineering Variables to Replace the Concept of ‘Noncombustibility’ | SpringerLink https://t.co/vAs7uwOqKy
5,156 followers
RT @FireTechnology: Engineering Variables to Replace the Concept of ‘Noncombustibility’ | SpringerLink https://t.co/vAs7uwOqKy
1,288 followers
RT @FireTechnology: Engineering Variables to Replace the Concept of ‘Noncombustibility’ | SpringerLink https://t.co/vAs7uwOqKy
12,043 followers
RT @gollnerfire: Interesting article by Babrauskas. I agree, we shouldn’t define something as simply non-combustable, we should use quantit…
2,447 followers
Interesting article by Babrauskas. I agree, we shouldn’t define something as simply non-combustable, we should use quantitative values to define its flammability. This is a problem thought fire engineering regulations. Better to quantify materials rather t
12,043 followers
RT @FireTechnology: Engineering Variables to Replace the Concept of ‘Noncombustibility’ | SpringerLink https://t.co/vAs7uwOqKy
3,356 followers
Engineering Variables to Replace the Concept of ‘Noncombustibility’ | SpringerLink https://t.co/vAs7uwOqKy
3,356 followers
The concept of noncombustibility evolved in early building codes before quantitative methods of fire hazard existed https://t.co/4NEQy1Ccj0