↓ Skip to main content

Disentangling the evolutionary history of three related shrub species using genome-wide molecular markers

Overview of attention for article published in Conservation Genetics, May 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (58th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
6 tweeters

Readers on

mendeley
6 Mendeley
Title
Disentangling the evolutionary history of three related shrub species using genome-wide molecular markers
Published in
Conservation Genetics, May 2019
DOI 10.1007/s10592-019-01197-x
Authors

Dona Kireta, Matthew J. Christmas, Andrew J. Lowe, Martin F. Breed

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 6 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 2 33%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 17%
Professor 1 17%
Researcher 1 17%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 17%
Other 0 0%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 50%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 33%
Environmental Science 1 17%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 August 2019.
All research outputs
#7,067,419
of 13,941,062 outputs
Outputs from Conservation Genetics
#422
of 704 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#104,723
of 257,611 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Conservation Genetics
#8
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,941,062 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 704 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 257,611 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.