307 followers
RT @lostphysicianYB: 尚カンジダ菌血症ではプロカルシトニンが上がりにくいという報告があり https://t.co/vmvGFwUdTr もしかしたら重症度の割に上昇してない場合はCandida考えてもよい？ というのも有名ですが、 これもいうほど違いない…
3,383 followers
尚カンジダ菌血症ではプロカルシトニンが上がりにくいという報告があり https://t.co/vmvGFwUdTr もしかしたら重症度の割に上昇してない場合はCandida考えてもよい？ というのも有名ですが、 これもいうほど違いないんじゃない？と https://t.co/kgA5T09ts5
201 followers
RT @Crit_Care: Procalcitonin levels in candidemia versus bacteremia: a systematic review #FOAMed #FOAMcc https://t.co/j4ntkeP63m
6,842 followers
2,268 followers
RT @criticcaredoc: No surprises - #PCT should not be used as a standalone tool for the differential diagnosis between #candidemia and #bact…
2,268 followers
#PCT @rosiluluflor @cicsati @CarinaBalasini @yomirita13
346 followers
RT @Crit_Care: Procalcitonin levels in candidemia versus bacteremia: a systematic review #FOAMed #FOAMcc https://t.co/j4ntkeP63m
7,381 followers
RT @bagin_vladimir: Procalcitonin levels in candidemia versus bacteremia: a systematic review https://t.co/u9vXnDDFa2
154 followers
Procalcitonin levels in candidemia versus bacteremia: a systematic review https://t.co/u9vXnDDFa2
90 followers
RT @Crit_Care: Procalcitonin levels in candidemia versus bacteremia: a systematic review #FOAMed #FOAMcc https://t.co/j4ntkeP63m
534 followers
RT @Crit_Care: Procalcitonin levels in candidemia versus bacteremia: a systematic review #FOAMed #FOAMcc https://t.co/j4ntkeP63m
2,886 followers
RT @Crit_Care: Procalcitonin levels in candidemia versus bacteremia: a systematic review #FOAMed #FOAMcc https://t.co/j4ntkeP63m
275 followers
RT @cholodelvado: Procalcitonina NO debe utilizarse como una herramienta independiente para el diagnóstico diferencial entre la candidemia…
11 followers
I knew it !!!!
1,487 followers
RT @Crit_Care: Procalcitonin levels in candidemia versus bacteremia: a systematic review #FOAMed #FOAMcc https://t.co/j4ntkeP63m
763 followers
RT @Crit_Care: Procalcitonin levels in candidemia versus bacteremia: a systematic review #FOAMed #FOAMcc https://t.co/j4ntkeP63m
47 followers
RT @Crit_Care: Procalcitonin levels in candidemia versus bacteremia: a systematic review #FOAMed #FOAMcc https://t.co/j4ntkeP63m
6,897 followers
RT @Crit_Care: Procalcitonin levels in candidemia versus bacteremia: a systematic review #FOAMed #FOAMcc https://t.co/j4ntkeP63m
12 followers
RT @jswol: Systematic review conclusion: PCT should not be used as a standalone tool for the differential diagnosis between candidemia and…
3,356 followers
RT @Crit_Care: Procalcitonin levels in candidemia versus bacteremia: a systematic review #FOAMed #FOAMcc https://t.co/j4ntkeP63m
64 followers
RT @Crit_Care: Procalcitonin levels in candidemia versus bacteremia: a systematic review #FOAMed #FOAMcc https://t.co/j4ntkeP63m
110 followers
RT @Crit_Care: Procalcitonin levels in candidemia versus bacteremia: a systematic review #FOAMed #FOAMcc https://t.co/j4ntkeP63m
639 followers
RT @DocMusician: Más clavitos al ataúd de la procalcitoninita https://t.co/85HP28UuPM
70 followers
RT @Crit_Care: Procalcitonin levels in candidemia versus bacteremia: a systematic review #FOAMed #FOAMcc https://t.co/j4ntkeP63m
500 followers
RT @Crit_Care: Procalcitonin levels in candidemia versus bacteremia: a systematic review #FOAMed #FOAMcc https://t.co/j4ntkeP63m
1,919 followers
RT @Crit_Care: Procalcitonin levels in candidemia versus bacteremia: a systematic review #FOAMed #FOAMcc https://t.co/j4ntkeP63m
526 followers
RT @Crit_Care: Procalcitonin levels in candidemia versus bacteremia: a systematic review #FOAMed #FOAMcc https://t.co/j4ntkeP63m
303 followers
Procalcitonina NO debe utilizarse como una herramienta independiente para el diagnóstico diferencial entre la candidemia y la bacteriemia (evidencia limitada) #foamed #procalcitonina #sepsis #FOAMcc #hongos #candida https://t.co/55KeFtqRcb
7,381 followers
RT @ashaddadin11: Procalcitonin levels in candidemia versus bacteremia: a systematic review | Critical Care | Full Text https://t.co/6Moksd…
153 followers
RT @Crit_Care: Procalcitonin levels in candidemia versus bacteremia: a systematic review #FOAMed #FOAMcc https://t.co/j4ntkeP63m
983 followers
RT @Crit_Care: Procalcitonin levels in candidemia versus bacteremia: a systematic review #FOAMed #FOAMcc https://t.co/j4ntkeP63m
351 followers
462 followers
Candidemia remains on the differential for patients with high procal, and no evidence for procal-guided duration of anti-fungals. Can be devastating in the immunocompromised.
3,008 followers
RT @Crit_Care: Procalcitonin levels in candidemia versus bacteremia: a systematic review #FOAMed #FOAMcc https://t.co/j4ntkeP63m
77 followers
RT @Crit_Care: Procalcitonin levels in candidemia versus bacteremia: a systematic review #FOAMed #FOAMcc https://t.co/j4ntkeP63m
428 followers
RT @Crit_Care: Procalcitonin levels in candidemia versus bacteremia: a systematic review #FOAMed #FOAMcc https://t.co/j4ntkeP63m
393 followers
RT @Crit_Care: Procalcitonin levels in candidemia versus bacteremia: a systematic review #FOAMed #FOAMcc https://t.co/j4ntkeP63m
7,210 followers
Más clavitos al ataúd de la procalcitoninita
74 followers
RT @Crit_Care: Procalcitonin levels in candidemia versus bacteremia: a systematic review #FOAMed #FOAMcc https://t.co/j4ntkeP63m
2,006 followers
RT @Crit_Care: Procalcitonin levels in candidemia versus bacteremia: a systematic review #FOAMed #FOAMcc https://t.co/j4ntkeP63m
1,040 followers
RT @Crit_Care: Procalcitonin levels in candidemia versus bacteremia: a systematic review #FOAMed #FOAMcc https://t.co/j4ntkeP63m
169 followers
RT @Crit_Care: Procalcitonin levels in candidemia versus bacteremia: a systematic review #FOAMed #FOAMcc https://t.co/j4ntkeP63m
768 followers
RT @Crit_Care: Procalcitonin levels in candidemia versus bacteremia: a systematic review #FOAMed #FOAMcc https://t.co/j4ntkeP63m
288 followers
RT @Crit_Care: Procalcitonin levels in candidemia versus bacteremia: a systematic review #FOAMed #FOAMcc https://t.co/j4ntkeP63m
273 followers
RT @Crit_Care: Procalcitonin levels in candidemia versus bacteremia: a systematic review #FOAMed #FOAMcc https://t.co/j4ntkeP63m
209 followers
RT @Crit_Care: Procalcitonin levels in candidemia versus bacteremia: a systematic review #FOAMed #FOAMcc https://t.co/j4ntkeP63m
151 followers
RT @Crit_Care: Procalcitonin levels in candidemia versus bacteremia: a systematic review #FOAMed #FOAMcc https://t.co/j4ntkeP63m
3,376 followers
RT @Crit_Care: Procalcitonin levels in candidemia versus bacteremia: a systematic review #FOAMed #FOAMcc https://t.co/j4ntkeP63m
7,381 followers
RT @jswol: Systematic review conclusion: PCT should not be used as a standalone tool for the differential diagnosis between candidemia and…
3,421 followers
Systematic review conclusion: PCT should not be used as a standalone tool for the differential diagnosis between candidemia and bacteremia due to limited supporting evidence. https://t.co/bXGWnJl2UU #FOAMcc #FOAMed
522 followers
RT @Crit_Care: Procalcitonin levels in candidemia versus bacteremia: a systematic review #FOAMed #FOAMcc https://t.co/j4ntkeP63m
1,831 followers
RT @Crit_Care: Procalcitonin levels in candidemia versus bacteremia: a systematic review #FOAMed #FOAMcc https://t.co/j4ntkeP63m
143 followers
RT @Crit_Care: Procalcitonin levels in candidemia versus bacteremia: a systematic review #FOAMed #FOAMcc https://t.co/j4ntkeP63m
7,381 followers
RT @Crit_Care: Procalcitonin levels in candidemia versus bacteremia: a systematic review #FOAMed #FOAMcc https://t.co/j4ntkeP63m
17,041 followers
RT @Crit_Care: Procalcitonin levels in candidemia versus bacteremia: a systematic review #FOAMed #FOAMcc https://t.co/j4ntkeP63m
151 followers
RT @Crit_Care: Procalcitonin levels in candidemia versus bacteremia: a systematic review #FOAMed #FOAMcc https://t.co/j4ntkeP63m
55,170 followers
Procalcitonin levels in candidemia versus bacteremia: a systematic review #FOAMed #FOAMcc https://t.co/j4ntkeP63m
78 followers
RT @intensivecare_c: ICUでもそれ以外でも、プロカルシトニン単独ではcandidemiaとbacteremiaを区別できない。 https://t.co/ktOXorzYIs https://t.co/ktOXorzYIs
272 followers
RT @intensivecare_c: ICUでもそれ以外でも、プロカルシトニン単独ではcandidemiaとbacteremiaを区別できない。 https://t.co/ktOXorzYIs https://t.co/ktOXorzYIs
20,635 followers
RT @intensivecare_c: ICUでもそれ以外でも、プロカルシトニン単独ではcandidemiaとbacteremiaを区別できない。 https://t.co/ktOXorzYIs https://t.co/ktOXorzYIs
449 followers
RT @intensivecare_c: ICUでもそれ以外でも、プロカルシトニン単独ではcandidemiaとbacteremiaを区別できない。 https://t.co/ktOXorzYIs https://t.co/ktOXorzYIs
117 followers
RT @intensivecare_c: ICUでもそれ以外でも、プロカルシトニン単独ではcandidemiaとbacteremiaを区別できない。 https://t.co/ktOXorzYIs https://t.co/ktOXorzYIs
12,400 followers
ICUでもそれ以外でも、プロカルシトニン単独ではcandidemiaとbacteremiaを区別できない。 https://t.co/ktOXorzYIs https://t.co/ktOXorzYIs
69 followers
RT @criticcaredoc: No surprises - #PCT should not be used as a standalone tool for the differential diagnosis between #candidemia and #bact…
89 followers
RT @criticcaredoc: No surprises - #PCT should not be used as a standalone tool for the differential diagnosis between #candidemia and #bact…
31,497 followers
RT @criticcaredoc: No surprises - #PCT should not be used as a standalone tool for the differential diagnosis between #candidemia and #bact…
20 followers
Procalcitonin levels in candidemia versus bacteremia: a systematic review https://t.co/WxLjJZgeCq
794 followers
RT @criticcaredoc: No surprises - #PCT should not be used as a standalone tool for the differential diagnosis between #candidemia and #bact…
7,381 followers
RT @Infermiere_line: Procalcitonin levels in #candidemia versus bacteremia: a systematic review @Crit_Care | #ECM https://t.co/pntxV6U3xZ
7,381 followers
RT @ProfAnestesista: Procalcitonin levels in #candidemia versus bacteremia: a systematic review @Crit_Care | #ECM https://t.co/3XSlLH7bFP
3,174 followers
RT @ProfAnestesista: Procalcitonin levels in #candidemia versus bacteremia: a systematic review @Crit_Care | #ECM https://t.co/3XSlLH7bFP
1,513 followers
Procalcitonin levels in #candidemia versus bacteremia: a systematic review @Crit_Care | #ECM https://t.co/pntxV6U3xZ
613 followers
Procalcitonin levels in #candidemia versus bacteremia: a systematic review @Crit_Care | #ECM https://t.co/3XSlLH7bFP
3 followers
RT @criticcaredoc: No surprises - #PCT should not be used as a standalone tool for the differential diagnosis between #candidemia and #bact…
3,376 followers
RT @criticcaredoc: No surprises - #PCT should not be used as a standalone tool for the differential diagnosis between #candidemia and #bact…
321 followers
RT @criticcaredoc: No surprises - #PCT should not be used as a standalone tool for the differential diagnosis between #candidemia and #bact…
3,931 followers
RT @criticcaredoc: No surprises - #PCT should not be used as a standalone tool for the differential diagnosis between #candidemia and #bact…
55,681 followers
RT @criticcaredoc: No surprises - #PCT should not be used as a standalone tool for the differential diagnosis between #candidemia and #bact…
346 followers
RT @criticcaredoc: No surprises - #PCT should not be used as a standalone tool for the differential diagnosis between #candidemia and #bact…
2,735 followers
RT @criticcaredoc: No surprises - #PCT should not be used as a standalone tool for the differential diagnosis between #candidemia and #bact…
8,044 followers
No surprises - #PCT should not be used as a standalone tool for the differential diagnosis between #candidemia and #bacteremia due to limited supporting evidence #procalcitonin https://t.co/lcj2sxq6Z0
2 followers
Procalcitonin levels in candidemia versus bacteremia: a systematic review | Critical Care | Full Text #ICU #infection #intensivecare #medicine #diagnosis #lab #candida #procalcitonin #criticalcare #sepsis #candidemia #fungi #unipa https://t.co/hw6BWAsCye
7,381 followers
RT @AndCorteg: Procalcitonin levels in candidemia versus bacteremia: a systematic review @Crit_Care #candida #intensivecare #ICU #fungi #In…
346 followers
Procalcitonin levels in candidemia versus bacteremia: a systematic review @Crit_Care #candida #intensivecare #ICU #fungi #Infection #sepsis https://t.co/g3iHu8bSth
7,381 followers
RT @Candida_papers: Procalcitonin levels in candidemia versus bacteremia: a systematic review. https://t.co/uxfo2cAVgi
150 followers
Procalcitonin levels in candidemia versus bacteremia: a systematic review. https://t.co/uxfo2cAVgi