Detection of repeating earthquakes and their application in characterizing slow fault slip
Progress in Earth and Planetary Science, May 2019
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
|Members of the public||9||82%|
|Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors)||1||9%|
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 93 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
|Readers by professional status||Count||As %|
|Student > Ph. D. Student||21||23%|
|Student > Master||12||13%|
|Student > Doctoral Student||6||6%|
|Student > Bachelor||6||6%|
|Readers by discipline||Count||As %|
|Earth and Planetary Sciences||56||60%|
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 June 2019.
All research outputs
of 24,164,942 outputs
Outputs from Progress in Earth and Planetary Science
of 554 outputs
Outputs of similar age
of 354,077 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Progress in Earth and Planetary Science
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,164,942 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 554 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 354,077 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.